01721 2200217 4500001002100000005001500021035002000036007000300056008003900059020001800098082001500116084002200131100002100153245011500174250001600289260003100305300002300336500007500359650004400434520102500478INLIS00000000001000920210908044522 a0010-0921000044ta210908 | | |  a9780429467097 a347.43/035 a347.43/035 KÁL c0 aKálmán, Pócza1 aConstitutional Politics and the Judiciary :bDecision-making in Central and Eastern Europe /cPócza Kálmán a1st edition aLondon :bRoutledge,c2018 a274 pages ;c24 cm ae-book 4aConstitutional courts--Europe, Eastern. aRecent confrontations between constitutional courts and parliamentary majorities, for example in Poland and Hungary, have attracted international interest in the relationship between the judiciary and the legislature in Central and Eastern European countries. Several political actors have argued that courts have assumed too much power after the democratic transformation process in 1989/1990. These claims are explicitly or implicitly connected to the charge that courts have constrained the room for manoeuvre of the legislatures too heavily and that they have entered the field of politics. Nevertheless, the question to what extent has this aggregation of power constrained the dominant political actors has never been examined accurately and systematically in the literature. The present volume fills this gap by applying an innovative research methodology to quantify the impact and effect of court’s decisions on legislation and legislators, and measure the strength of judicial decisions in six CEE countries.