01166     2200229   4500001002100000005001500021008004100036020001800077035001900095041000800114082001200122084001800134100001900152245005400171250001000225260004200235300001600277500002100293520058300314650002100897650001800918INLIS00000000000136420200508201434200508|||||||||   |   |||   |||| ||eng||  a0-314-81258-x  0010-0520001364  aeng0 a347.307  a347.307/BIN/F0 aDavid A Binder00aFact Investigation From Hypothesis to Proof 07600  aCet.1  aMinneapolistbSage Publicationsc1984  axxi,354 hlm  aIndeks : 347-354  aDescribes how facts are proved at trial, examining the principal categories of rational and psychological evidence, which is the basis of trial "stories." How, at trial, does each party tell a story bolstering its own legal position and detracting from that of its adversary? What attributes of stories tend to make them persuasive? From these attributes, the authors derive a set of investigatory objectives that generally apply, regardless of the nature of the case. With objectives in place, turns to the thought processes that lawyers employ to analyze and develop evidence. 0aEvidance(Law)-US 0aInvestigation