01508     2200265   4500001002100000005001500021035002000036008004100056020002000097041000800117082001100125084001700136100002700153245007900180250001000259260003800269300001700307500001800324520075100342650003701093650004301130700001701173990002601190990002601216INLIS00000000000142620221107082941  a0010-0520001426221107                |          | eng    a987-0836-613100  aeng  a346.73  a346.73 BLO e0 aBloomenthal, Harold S.1 aEmerging Trends in Securities Law /cHarold S.Bloomenthal and Samuel Wolff  aCet.1  aMinneapolist :bWest Group,c1998  acxi,1309 hlm  aIndeks : 1-32  aEmerging trends in securities law for the tenth year chonicles securities developments for the year measured between July 1 of the preceding year through June 30 of the current year, the end of the Supreme Court's most recent term. In some instances developments post-June 30 and prior to publications have been taken into account There was no decision of the Supreme Court during its last term directly relating to securities regulation. A decisions of the Court that suggest civil penalties are unlikely to constitute jeopardy under the double jeopardy claus lessens concerns when the Comissions seeks civil penalties before determining whether to refer a matter for criminal prosecution that such penalties may preclude a criminal prosecution. 4a1.Securities-United States-cases 4a2.Securities Fraud-United States-Cases0 aSamuel Wolff  a07686/MKRI-P/XII-2007  a07686/MKRI-P/XII-2007