01390     2200313   4500001002100000005001500021035002000036008004100056020002000097041000800117082000800125084001400133100001600147245007500163260005100238300002400289500002000313504001700333520050300350650002800853650003100881650002000912990002400932990002400956990002400980990002401004990002401028990002401052INLIS00000000000229920221101014802  a0010-0520002299221101                |          | eng    a978-658-767-857  aeng  a342  a342 IYE j0 aIyer, T.K.K1 aJudicial Review of Reasonableness in Constitutional Law /cT.K.K. Iyer  aLondon :bThe Madras Law Journal Office,c1979  alx, 239 p. ;c24 cm  aIndeks : indeks  aBinliography  aJudicial review under a constitutional frame work, is, in one view, as Iyer brings out "a value ridden policy making exercuse". It is only natural that such studies should highlight judicial activism or restraint. Restraint may be called for when there is reasonable hope that political forces may themselves find the need solution in the near future, but pursuit of this dichotomy seems fruitless beyond a point, because in spesific cases at least self-restraint could reflect political attitudes. 4aJudicial review - India 4aConstitutional Law - India 4aJudicial review  a00841/MKRI-P/I-2005  a00842/MKRI-P/I-2005  a00842/MKRI-P/I-2005  a00841/MKRI-P/I-2005  a00841/MKRI-P/I-2005  a00842/MKRI-P/I-2005