01956     2200361   4500001002100000005001500021035002000036008004100056020002200097041000800119082001200127084001600139100004900155245008000204260003600284300003800320500002300358520081400381650005001195650004901245990002501294990002501319990002501344990002501369990002501394990002501419990002501444990002501469990002501494990002501519990002501544990002501569INLIS00000000000344520221101041023  a0010-0520003445221101                |          | eng    a978-90-411-2605-4  aeng  a343.240  a343.240 ART0 aArticle 234 and Competition Law: An Analysis1 aArticle 234 and Competition Law :bAn Analysis /cEdited by Barry J. Rodger  aBoston :bWolters Kluwer,c2008  alxvi, 610 p. :b: illus. ;c25 cm  aIndeks : p.601-610  aIt is a truism that almost all the major principles established by the ECJ have been decided in the context of a reference to that court for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 (ex 177) EC. Article 234 facilitates a dialogue between the national courts and the ECJ in order to allow national courts to seek guidance on the appropriate interpretation of Community law principles in a particular legal dispute. From a Community perspective, this process should enhance the uniform and consistent interpretation of Community law throughout the national courts. This research is comprehensive in reviewing all competition law-related rullings to 1 May 2004, and pioneering as being the first systematic attempt to collate detailed information on all relevant cases including crucially the post-rulling process. 4aRestraint of trade - European Union Countries 4aAdvisory opinions - European Union Countries  a09924/MKRI-P/XI-2008  a09926/MKRI-P/XI-2008  a09925/MKRI-P/XI-2008  a09926/MKRI-P/XI-2008  a09924/MKRI-P/XI-2008  a09925/MKRI-P/XI-2008  a09925/MKRI-P/XI-2008  a09924/MKRI-P/XI-2008  a09926/MKRI-P/XI-2008  a09924/MKRI-P/XI-2008  a09926/MKRI-P/XI-2008  a09925/MKRI-P/XI-2008