02074     2200469   4500001002100000005001500021035002000036008004100056020001500097041000800112082001100120084001700131100002200148245010100170260004800271300003500319500002600354520062100380650002201001650005401023650002201077990002501099990002601124990002501150990002501175990002501200990002601225990002501251990002501276990002501301990002501326990002601351990002501377990002501402990002501427990002601452990002501478990002601503990002501529990002501554990002501579INLIS00000000000939720221108094941  a0010-0520009397221108                |          | eng    a0674022106  aeng  a347.73  a347.73 VER j0 aVermeule, Andrian1 aJudging Under Uncertainty :bAn Institutional Theory of Legal Interpretation /cAndrian Vermeule  aLondon :bCambridge University Press,c2006  aviii ; 333 hlm ;22 cm ;c22 cm  aIndeks : hlm. 323-333  aHow should judges, in America and elsewhere, interpret statutes and the Constitution? Previous work on these fundamental questions has typically started from abstract views about the nature of democracy or constitutionalism, or the nature of legal language, or the essence of the rule of law. From these conceptual premises, theorists typically deduce an ambitious role for judges, particularly in striking down statutes on constitutional grounds. In this book, Adrian Vermeule breaks new ground by rejecting both the conceptual approach and the judge-centered conclusions of older theorists. Vermeule shows that any 4a1.Judicial Review 4a2.Law-United States-Interpretation & Construction 4a3.Judicial Proses  a05796/MKRI-P/IX-2008  a07724/MKRI-P/XII-2007  a22474/MKRI-P/XI-2011  a22473/MKRI-P/XI-2011  a05796/MKRI-P/IX-2008  a07724/MKRI-P/XII-2007  a22474/MKRI-P/XI-2011  a22473/MKRI-P/XI-2011  a22473/MKRI-P/XI-2011  a05796/MKRI-P/IX-2008  a07724/MKRI-P/XII-2007  a22474/MKRI-P/XI-2011  a22474/MKRI-P/XI-2011  a05796/MKRI-P/IX-2008  a07724/MKRI-P/XII-2007  a22473/MKRI-P/XI-2011  a07724/MKRI-P/XII-2007  a05796/MKRI-P/IX-2008  a22474/MKRI-P/XI-2011  a22473/MKRI-P/XI-2011