02074 2200469 4500001002100000005001500021035002000036008004100056020001500097041000800112082001100120084001700131100002200148245010100170260004800271300003500319500002600354520062100380650002201001650005401023650002201077990002501099990002601124990002501150990002501175990002501200990002601225990002501251990002501276990002501301990002501326990002601351990002501377990002501402990002501427990002601452990002501478990002601503990002501529990002501554990002501579INLIS00000000000939720221108094941 a0010-0520009397221108 | | eng  a0674022106 aeng a347.73 a347.73 VER j0 aVermeule, Andrian1 aJudging Under Uncertainty :bAn Institutional Theory of Legal Interpretation /cAndrian Vermeule aLondon :bCambridge University Press,c2006 aviii ; 333 hlm ;22 cm ;c22 cm aIndeks : hlm. 323-333 aHow should judges, in America and elsewhere, interpret statutes and the Constitution? Previous work on these fundamental questions has typically started from abstract views about the nature of democracy or constitutionalism, or the nature of legal language, or the essence of the rule of law. From these conceptual premises, theorists typically deduce an ambitious role for judges, particularly in striking down statutes on constitutional grounds. In this book, Adrian Vermeule breaks new ground by rejecting both the conceptual approach and the judge-centered conclusions of older theorists. Vermeule shows that any 4a1.Judicial Review 4a2.Law-United States-Interpretation & Construction 4a3.Judicial Proses a05796/MKRI-P/IX-2008 a07724/MKRI-P/XII-2007 a22474/MKRI-P/XI-2011 a22473/MKRI-P/XI-2011 a05796/MKRI-P/IX-2008 a07724/MKRI-P/XII-2007 a22474/MKRI-P/XI-2011 a22473/MKRI-P/XI-2011 a22473/MKRI-P/XI-2011 a05796/MKRI-P/IX-2008 a07724/MKRI-P/XII-2007 a22474/MKRI-P/XI-2011 a22474/MKRI-P/XI-2011 a05796/MKRI-P/IX-2008 a07724/MKRI-P/XII-2007 a22473/MKRI-P/XI-2011 a07724/MKRI-P/XII-2007 a05796/MKRI-P/IX-2008 a22474/MKRI-P/XI-2011 a22473/MKRI-P/XI-2011