01600     2200277   4500001002100000005001500021035002000036008004100056020002200097041000800119082001100127084001700138100001800155700002200173245007600195260003200271300002700303520080200330650004001132990002501172990002501197990002501222990002501247990002501272990002501297INLIS00000000000962820221103103215  a0010-0520009628221103                |          | eng    a978-0-314-26609-5  aeng  a342.73  a342.73 NOW p0 aNowak, John E0 aRonald D. Rotunda1 aPrinciples of Constitutional Law /cJohn E. Nowak and Ronald D. Rotunda  aSt. Paul, MN :bWest,c2010  axxvi, 875 p. ;c24 cm.  aThe Court might have held that the right did not vest until delivery of the commission, thus avoiding the constitutional issues, but the Court instead stated that an irrevocable right accrued to individual after the execution of the commission. The Court thus critized the new administration and President Jefferson, who was Marshall’ political adversary. On the second issue, the opinion found that the “essence of civil liberty” required a legal remedy for a legal wrong. Because the government of the United States is one “of laws and not of men” it must grant a remedy for violation of vested legal rights. Marshall did note that there would not be a judicial remedy for a wrong if the subject matter was political in nature of otherwise committed to the discretion of the executive. 4aConstitutional law --United States.  a22149/MKRI-P/XI-2011  a22148/MKRI-P/XI-2011  a22149/MKRI-P/XI-2011  a22148/MKRI-P/XI-2011  a22148/MKRI-P/XI-2011  a22149/MKRI-P/XI-2011