| Judul | Justice In Robes / Ronald Dworkin |
| Pengarang | Dworkin, Ronald |
| EDISI | 1 |
| Penerbitan | London : Hadvard University Press, 2006 |
| Deskripsi Fisik | 308 p. ; 24cm ;24cm |
| ISBN | 0-6740-2167-3 |
| Subjek | 1. Judicial Process-Philosophy 2. Law-Interpretation and Construction 3. Law and Ethics |
| Abstrak | This book provide summarizes the author own widely discussed account of these connections, which emphasizes the sovereign importance of moral principle in legal and constitutional interpretation, and then reviews and criticized the most influential rival theories to his own. The author argues that pragmatism is empty as a theory of law, that value pluralism misunderstands the nature of moral concepts, that constitutional originalsm reflects an impoverished view of the role of a constitution in a democratic society, and that contemporary legal positivism is based on a mistaken semantic theory and an erroneous account of the nature of authority. |
| Catatan | Indeks : Index |
| Bahasa | Inggris |
| Bentuk Karya | Tidak ada kode yang sesuai |
| Target Pembaca | Tidak ada kode yang sesuai |
| Tag | Ind1 | Ind2 | Isi |
| 001 | INLIS000000000001419 | ||
| 005 | 20241022025622 | ||
| 008 | 241022################|##########|#eng## | ||
| 020 | # | # | $a 0-6740-2167-3 |
| 035 | # | # | $a 0010-0520001419 |
| 041 | $a eng | ||
| 082 | # | # | $a 340.112 |
| 084 | # | # | $a 340.112 DWO j |
| 100 | 0 | # | $a Dworkin, Ronald |
| 245 | 1 | # | $a Justice In Robes /$c Ronald Dworkin |
| 250 | # | # | $a 1 |
| 260 | # | # | $a London :$b Hadvard University Press,$c 2006 |
| 300 | # | # | $a 308 p. ; 24cm ; $c 24cm |
| 500 | # | # | $a Indeks : Index |
| 520 | # | # | $a This book provide summarizes the author own widely discussed account of these connections, which emphasizes the sovereign importance of moral principle in legal and constitutional interpretation, and then reviews and criticized the most influential rival theories to his own. The author argues that pragmatism is empty as a theory of law, that value pluralism misunderstands the nature of moral concepts, that constitutional originalsm reflects an impoverished view of the role of a constitution in a democratic society, and that contemporary legal positivism is based on a mistaken semantic theory and an erroneous account of the nature of authority. |
| 650 | 4 | $a 1. Judicial Process-Philosophy | |
| 650 | 4 | $a 2. Law-Interpretation and Construction | |
| 650 | 4 | $a 3. Law and Ethics | |
| 990 | # | # | $a 05821/MKRI-P/IX-2008 |
| 990 | # | # | $a 07583/MKRI-P/XII-2007 |
Content Unduh katalog
Karya Terkait :