Cite This        Tampung        Export Record
Judul Judging Democracy : The New Politics of The High Court of Australia / Haig Patapan
Pengarang Patapan,Haig
EDISI 1
Penerbitan UK : Cambridge University Press, 2000
Deskripsi Fisik XI, 206 p. ; 22,9cm ;22,9cm
ISBN 0-521-77428-4
Subjek 1. Australia High Court-Political Activity
2. Democracy Australia
Abstrak This book is in part a response to the Australian High Court?s Invitation for what it has called ?informed criticism? of its decisions. Informed criticism in this case required more than the usual categories or dichotomies-of activist/deferential, progressive/conservative- that tend to dominate commentary, not because they tend to partisanship and there-fore inaccuracy, but because they are often inadequate intellectual tools that do not do justice to the fundamental legal and political changes we need to consider in evaluating wthe new politics of the High Court.
Catatan Indeks : Index
Bibliography
Bahasa Inggris
Bentuk Karya Tidak ada kode yang sesuai
Target Pembaca Tidak ada kode yang sesuai

 
No Barcode No. Panggil Akses Lokasi Ketersediaan
00000005800 347.94035 PAT j Dapat dipinjam Perpustakaan Lantai 3 - Mahkamah Konstitusi RI Tersedia
pesan
00000006642 347.94035/PAT/J Dapat dipinjam Perpustakaan Lantai 3 - Mahkamah Konstitusi RI Tersedia
pesan
Tag Ind1 Ind2 Isi
001 INLIS000000000001469
005 20221109112459
008 221109################|##########|#eng##
020 # # $a 0-521-77428-4
035 # # $a 0010-0520001469
041 $a eng
082 # # $a 347.94035
084 # # $a 347.94035 PAT j
100 0 # $a Patapan,Haig
245 1 # $a Judging Democracy : $b The New Politics of The High Court of Australia /$c Haig Patapan
250 # # $a 1
260 # # $a UK :$b Cambridge University Press,$c 2000
300 # # $a XI, 206 p. ; 22,9cm ; $c 22,9cm
500 # # $a Indeks : Index
504 # # $a Bibliography
520 # # $a This book is in part a response to the Australian High Court?s Invitation for what it has called ?informed criticism? of its decisions. Informed criticism in this case required more than the usual categories or dichotomies-of activist/deferential, progressive/conservative- that tend to dominate commentary, not because they tend to partisanship and there-fore inaccuracy, but because they are often inadequate intellectual tools that do not do justice to the fundamental legal and political changes we need to consider in evaluating wthe new politics of the High Court.
650 4 $a 1. Australia High Court-Political Activity
650 4 $a 2. Democracy Australia
990 # # $a 05800/MKRI-P/IX-2008
990 # # $a 05800/MKRI-P/IX-2008
990 # # $a 06642/MKRI-P/XII-2007
990 # # $a 06642/MKRI-P/XII-2007
Content Unduh katalog