|
Tag
|
Ind1
|
Ind2
|
Isi
|
|
001
|
|
|
INLIS000000000002688
|
|
005
|
|
|
20221102035359
|
|
008
|
|
|
221102################|##########|#eng##
|
|
020
|
#
|
#
|
$a 978-0-521-70338-3
|
|
035
|
#
|
#
|
$a 0010-0520002688
|
|
041
|
|
|
$a eng
|
|
082
|
#
|
#
|
$a 342.730 852
|
|
084
|
#
|
#
|
$a 342.730 852 HAM g
|
|
100
|
0
|
#
|
$a Hamilton, Marci A
|
|
245
|
1
|
#
|
$a God vs. the Gavel : $b Religion and the Rule of Law /$c Marci A. Hamilton
|
|
260
|
#
|
#
|
$a Cambrigde :$b Cambridge University Press,$c 2005
|
|
300
|
#
|
#
|
$a xix, 414 p. ; $c 22 cm.
|
|
500
|
#
|
#
|
$a Indeks : p.399-414
|
|
520
|
#
|
#
|
$a God vs. the Gavel challenges the pervasive assumption that all religious conduct deserves constitutional protection. While religious conduct provides many benefits to society, it is not always benign. The thesis of the book is that anyone who harms another person should be governed by the laws that govern everyone else - and truth be told, religion is capable of great harm. It contents:Part one Why the Law Must Govern Religious Entities (The Problem, Children, Marriage, Religiouse Land Use and Residential Neighborhoods, Schools, The Prisons and the Military, Discrimination). Part two The History and Doctrine Behind the Rule That Subjects Religious Entities to Duly Enacted Laws (Boerne v. Flores: The Case That Fully Restored the Rule of Law for Religious Entities, The Decline of the Special Treatment of Religious Entities and the Rise of the No-Harm Rule, The Path to the Public Good).
|
|
650
|
|
4
|
$a Corporations, Religious - Law and Legislation - United States - Criminal Provisions.
|
|
650
|
|
4
|
$a Tort Liability of Religious Corporations - United States
|
|
990
|
#
|
#
|
$a 10182/MKRI-P/XI-2008
|
|
990
|
#
|
#
|
$a 10182/MKRI-P/XI-2008
|
|
990
|
#
|
#
|
$a 10182/MKRI-P/XI-2008
|
|
990
|
#
|
#
|
$a 10183/MKRI-P/XI-2008
|
|
990
|
#
|
#
|
$a 10183/MKRI-P/XI-2008
|
|
990
|
#
|
#
|
$a 10183/MKRI-P/XI-2008
|
