| Judul | Law, Legitimacy and the Rationing of Health Care : A Contextual and Comparative Perspective / Keith Syrett |
| Pengarang | Syrett, Keith |
| Penerbitan | Cambridge : Cambriedge University Press, 2007 |
| Deskripsi Fisik | xiii, 252 p. ;23cm. |
| ISBN | 978-0-521-67445-4 |
| Subjek | Legitimacy |
| Abstrak | Keith Syrett argues for a reappraisal of the role of public law adjudication in questions of healthcare rationing. As governments worldwide turn to explicit rationing strategies to manage the mismatch between demand for and supply of health services and treatments, disappointed patients and the public have sought to contest the moral authority of bodies making retioning decisions. This has led to the growing involvement of law in this field of public policy. Drawing upon jurisprudence from England, Canada, and South Africa, the book evaluates the capacity of courts to establish the condetions for a process of public deliberation from which legitimacy for healthcare rationing may be derived. |
| Catatan | Indeks : p.246-252 |
| Bahasa | Inggris |
| Bentuk Karya | Tidak ada kode yang sesuai |
| Target Pembaca | Tidak ada kode yang sesuai |
| Tag | Ind1 | Ind2 | Isi |
| 001 | INLIS000000000002801 | ||
| 005 | 20221103035941 | ||
| 008 | 221103################|##########|#eng## | ||
| 020 | # | # | $a 978-0-521-67445-4 |
| 035 | # | # | $a 0010-0520002801 |
| 041 | $a eng | ||
| 082 | # | # | $a 346.0175 |
| 084 | # | # | $a 346.0175 SYR l |
| 100 | 0 | # | $a Syrett, Keith |
| 245 | 1 | # | $a Law, Legitimacy and the Rationing of Health Care : $b A Contextual and Comparative Perspective /$c Keith Syrett |
| 260 | # | # | $a Cambridge :$b Cambriedge University Press,$c 2007 |
| 300 | # | # | $a xiii, 252 p. ; $c 23cm. |
| 500 | # | # | $a Indeks : p.246-252 |
| 520 | # | # | $a Keith Syrett argues for a reappraisal of the role of public law adjudication in questions of healthcare rationing. As governments worldwide turn to explicit rationing strategies to manage the mismatch between demand for and supply of health services and treatments, disappointed patients and the public have sought to contest the moral authority of bodies making retioning decisions. This has led to the growing involvement of law in this field of public policy. Drawing upon jurisprudence from England, Canada, and South Africa, the book evaluates the capacity of courts to establish the condetions for a process of public deliberation from which legitimacy for healthcare rationing may be derived. |
| 650 | 4 | $a Legitimacy | |
| 990 | # | # | $a 09821/MKRI-P/XI-2008 |
| 990 | # | # | $a 09821/MKRI-P/XI-2008 |
| 990 | # | # | $a 09821/MKRI-P/XI-2008 |
| 990 | # | # | $a 09822/MKRI-P/XI-2008 |
| 990 | # | # | $a 09822/MKRI-P/XI-2008 |
| 990 | # | # | $a 09822/MKRI-P/XI-2008 |
Content Unduh katalog
Karya Terkait :