| Judul | Interpreting Constitutions : A Comparative Study |
| Pengarang | Edited by Jeffrey Goldsworthy |
| Penerbitan | New York Routledge-Cavendish 2006 |
| Deskripsi Fisik | xvii, 353p.; 24 cm.24 cm. |
| ISBN | 0199274134 |
| Subjek | Constitutional law - Methodology Constitutional law - Philosophy |
| Abstrak | This book describes six major national constitutions and how they have been interpreted by their highest courts, compares the interpretive methods and underlying principles that have guided the courts, and explores the reasons for major differences between these methods and principles. Among the interpretive methods discussed are originalism, non-originalism, positivism, and normativism. Each chapter describes not only the interpretive methodology currently used by the courts, but the evolution of that methodology since the constitution was first enacted. It also includes a concluding chapter that compares these methodologies, and attempts to explain variations by reference to different social, historical, institutional, and political circumstances. The period bracketed by the dramatic moments of 1937 and 1954, written off as a forgotten time of failure and futility, was in reality the first phase of modern struggles to define the constitutional order that will dominate the twenty - first century. |
| Catatan | Indeks : p.347-353 |
| Bahasa | Inggris |
| Bentuk Karya | Tidak ada kode yang sesuai |
| Target Pembaca | Tidak ada kode yang sesuai |
| No Barcode | No. Panggil | Akses | Lokasi | Ketersediaan |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 00000011563 | 342.02/GOL/I | Dapat dipinjam | Perpustakaan Lantai 3 - Mahkamah Konstitusi RI | Tersedia
pesan |
| Tag | Ind1 | Ind2 | Isi |
| 001 | INLIS000000000004733 | ||
| 005 | 20200508202846 | ||
| 008 | 200508||||||||| | ||| |||| ||eng|| | ||
| 020 | $a 0199274134 | ||
| 035 | 0010-0520004733 | ||
| 041 | $a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | $a 342.02 | |
| 084 | $a 342.02/GOL/I | ||
| 100 | 0 | $a Edited by Jeffrey Goldsworthy | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | $a Interpreting Constitutions : A Comparative Study |
| 260 | $a New York $b Routledge-Cavendish $c 2006 | ||
| 300 | $a xvii, 353p.; 24 cm.$c 24 cm. | ||
| 500 | $a Indeks : p.347-353 | ||
| 520 | $a This book describes six major national constitutions and how they have been interpreted by their highest courts, compares the interpretive methods and underlying principles that have guided the courts, and explores the reasons for major differences between these methods and principles. Among the interpretive methods discussed are originalism, non-originalism, positivism, and normativism. Each chapter describes not only the interpretive methodology currently used by the courts, but the evolution of that methodology since the constitution was first enacted. It also includes a concluding chapter that compares these methodologies, and attempts to explain variations by reference to different social, historical, institutional, and political circumstances. The period bracketed by the dramatic moments of 1937 and 1954, written off as a forgotten time of failure and futility, was in reality the first phase of modern struggles to define the constitutional order that will dominate the twenty - first century. | ||
| 650 | 0 | $a Constitutional law - Methodology | |
| 650 | 0 | $a Constitutional law - Philosophy |
Content Unduh katalog
Karya Terkait :