Cite This        Tampung        Export Record
Judul The Unpublished Opinions Of The Warren Court / Schwartz Bernard
Pengarang Schwartz, Bernard
Penerbitan New York : Oxford University Press, 1996
Deskripsi Fisik 492 hlm. ; 24 cm ;24 cm
ISBN 9 780 195 0933 22
Subjek 1. Peradilan
2. Mahkamah konstitusi - Amerika
Abstrak In the last twenty years, the veil of secrecy surrounding the workings of the United States Supreme Court has been lifted. Justice Thurgood Marshall's controversial decision to make his papers available to the public ushered in a new era of openness about the operation of the Court--but not without criticism from Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist. The Unpublished Opinions of the Rehnquist Court provides a behind-the- scenes look at the Supreme Court, showing how changes between the drafts and the Justices' final opinions have created substantial differences in the outcome of the Court's decisions. As with his two previous works The Unpublished Opinions of the Warren Court and the Unpublished Opinions of the Burger Court, author Bernard Schwartz uses private court papers to follow these decisions and explore the key role and responsibility of the Chief Justice. Among the ten cases examined by Schwartz are key abortion cases Hodgson v. Minnesota and Webster v. Reproductive Health Services-- the original draft of which would have virtually overruled Roe v. Wade--as well as a civil rights case, Patterson v. McLean Credit Union. Schwartz considers the draft opinions and explains why the drafts were not issued as the final opinions and dissents in these cases. In particular, he shows what would have happened if the draft opinions had come down as the final opinions. The Unpublished Opinions of the Rehnquist Court serves to clarify and explore the actual operation of the judicial decision-making process. It will be fascinating and informative reading for attorneys, judges, law students, politicians and anyone interested in the mechanics of the nation's highest Court.
Bahasa Inggris
Bentuk Karya Bukan fiksi atau tidak didefinisikan
Target Pembaca Tidak ada kode yang sesuai

 
No Barcode No. Panggil Akses Lokasi Ketersediaan
0003726 347.73/BER/T Dapat dipinjam Perpustakaan Lantai 3 - Mahkamah Konstitusi RI Tersedia
pesan
00000005057 347.73 SCH u Dapat dipinjam Perpustakaan Lantai 3 - Mahkamah Konstitusi RI Tersedia
pesan
Tag Ind1 Ind2 Isi
001 INLIS000000000000793
005 20241018124636
008 241018################|##########0#eng##
020 # # $a 9 780 195 0933 22
035 # # $a 0010-0520000793
041 $a ind
082 # # $a 347.73
084 # # $a 347.73 SCH u
100 0 # $a Schwartz, Bernard
245 1 4 $a The Unpublished Opinions Of The Warren Court /$c Schwartz Bernard
260 # # $a New York :$b Oxford University Press,$c 1996
300 # # $a 492 hlm. ; 24 cm ; $c 24 cm
520 # # $a In the last twenty years, the veil of secrecy surrounding the workings of the United States Supreme Court has been lifted. Justice Thurgood Marshall's controversial decision to make his papers available to the public ushered in a new era of openness about the operation of the Court--but not without criticism from Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist. The Unpublished Opinions of the Rehnquist Court provides a behind-the- scenes look at the Supreme Court, showing how changes between the drafts and the Justices' final opinions have created substantial differences in the outcome of the Court's decisions. As with his two previous works The Unpublished Opinions of the Warren Court and the Unpublished Opinions of the Burger Court, author Bernard Schwartz uses private court papers to follow these decisions and explore the key role and responsibility of the Chief Justice. Among the ten cases examined by Schwartz are key abortion cases Hodgson v. Minnesota and Webster v. Reproductive Health Services-- the original draft of which would have virtually overruled Roe v. Wade--as well as a civil rights case, Patterson v. McLean Credit Union. Schwartz considers the draft opinions and explains why the drafts were not issued as the final opinions and dissents in these cases. In particular, he shows what would have happened if the draft opinions had come down as the final opinions. The Unpublished Opinions of the Rehnquist Court serves to clarify and explore the actual operation of the judicial decision-making process. It will be fascinating and informative reading for attorneys, judges, law students, politicians and anyone interested in the mechanics of the nation's highest Court.
650 4 $a 1. Peradilan
650 4 $a 2. Mahkamah konstitusi - Amerika
990 # # $a 00085/MKRI-P/IV-2007
990 # # $a 05057/MKRI-P/I-2007
Content Unduh katalog