Cite This        Tampung        Export Record
Judul Common Law Theory of Judicial Review : The Living Tree / W.J. Waluchow
Pengarang Waluchow
Penerbitan New York : Cambridge University Press, 2007
Deskripsi Fisik xi, 283 p.; 23 cm ;23 cm
ISBN 9780521864763
Subjek Judicial review
Civil Rights
Common Law
Abstrak In this study, W. J. Waluchow argues that debates between defenders and critics of constitutional bills of rights presuppose that constitutions are more or less rigid entities. Within such a conception, constitutions aspire to establish stable, fixed points of agreement and pre-commitment, which defenders consider to be possible and desirable, while critics deem impossible and undesirable. Drawing on reflections about the nature of law, constitutions, the common law, and what it is to be a democratic representative, Waluchow urges a different theory of bills of rights that is flexible and adaptable. Adopting such a theory enables one not only to answer to critics' most serious challenges, but also to appreciate the role that a bill of rights, interpreted and enforced by unelected judges, can sensibly play in a constitutional democracy.
Catatan p. 273-283
Bahasa Inggris
Bentuk Karya Tidak ada kode yang sesuai
Target Pembaca Tidak ada kode yang sesuai

 
No Barcode No. Panggil Akses Lokasi Ketersediaan
00000005606 347.710 12 WAL c Dapat dipinjam Perpustakaan Lantai 3 - Mahkamah Konstitusi RI Tersedia
pesan
Tag Ind1 Ind2 Isi
001 INLIS000000000008555
005 20221109090237
008 221109################|##########|#eng##
020 # # $a 9780521864763
035 # # $a 0010-0520008555
041 $a eng
082 # # $a 347.710 12
084 # # $a 347.710 12 WAL c
100 0 # $a Waluchow
245 1 2 $a Common Law Theory of Judicial Review : $b The Living Tree /$c W.J. Waluchow
260 # # $a New York :$b Cambridge University Press,$c 2007
300 # # $a xi, 283 p.; 23 cm ; $c 23 cm
504 # # $a p. 273-283
520 # # $a In this study, W. J. Waluchow argues that debates between defenders and critics of constitutional bills of rights presuppose that constitutions are more or less rigid entities. Within such a conception, constitutions aspire to establish stable, fixed points of agreement and pre-commitment, which defenders consider to be possible and desirable, while critics deem impossible and undesirable. Drawing on reflections about the nature of law, constitutions, the common law, and what it is to be a democratic representative, Waluchow urges a different theory of bills of rights that is flexible and adaptable. Adopting such a theory enables one not only to answer to critics' most serious challenges, but also to appreciate the role that a bill of rights, interpreted and enforced by unelected judges, can sensibly play in a constitutional democracy.
650 4 $a Civil Rights
650 4 $a Common Law
650 4 $a Judicial review
990 # # $a 05606/MKRI-P/VI-2008
990 # # $a 05606/MKRI-P/VI-2008
Content Unduh katalog