Cite This        Tampung        Export Record
Judul Petulant and Contrary: Approaches by the Permanent Five Members of the UN Security Council to the Concept of threat to the peace under Article 39 of the UN Charter
Pengarang Tamsin Phillipa Paige
Penerbitan Leiden Brill 2019
Deskripsi Fisik xiv, 330 pp.
ISBN 978-90-04-39142-0
Subjek Human Rights
Human Rights and Humanitarian Law
International Relation
Abstrak Aside from self-defence, a UN Security Council authorisation under Chapter VII is the only exception to the prohibition on the use of force. Authorisation of the use of force requires the Security Council to first determine whether that situation constitutes a ‘threat to the peace’ under Article 39. The Charter has long been interpreted as placing few bounds around how the Security Council arrives at such determinations. As such commentators have argued that the phrase threat to the peace is undefinable in nature and lacking in consistency. Through a critical discourse analysis of the justificatory discourse of the P5 surrounding individual decisions relating to ‘threat to the peace’ (found in the meeting transcripts), this book demonstrates that each P5 member has a consistent definition and understanding of what constitutes a threat to the peace.
Catatan e-book
Bahasa Inggris
Bentuk Karya Tidak ada kode yang sesuai
Target Pembaca Tidak ada kode yang sesuai

 
No Barcode No. Panggil Akses Lokasi Ketersediaan
Tag Ind1 Ind2 Isi
001 INLIS000000000009743
005 20200508204933
008 200508||||||||| | ||| |||| ||eng||
020 $a 978-90-04-39142-0
035 0010-0520009743
041 $a eng
082 0 $a 327
084 $a 327/PAI/P
100 0 $a Tamsin Phillipa Paige
245 0 0 $a Petulant and Contrary: Approaches by the Permanent Five Members of the UN Security Council to the Concept of threat to the peace under Article 39 of the UN Charter
260 $a Leiden $b Brill $c 2019
300 $a xiv, 330 pp.
500 $a e-book
520 $a Aside from self-defence, a UN Security Council authorisation under Chapter VII is the only exception to the prohibition on the use of force. Authorisation of the use of force requires the Security Council to first determine whether that situation constitutes a ‘threat to the peace’ under Article 39. The Charter has long been interpreted as placing few bounds around how the Security Council arrives at such determinations. As such commentators have argued that the phrase threat to the peace is undefinable in nature and lacking in consistency. Through a critical discourse analysis of the justificatory discourse of the P5 surrounding individual decisions relating to ‘threat to the peace’ (found in the meeting transcripts), this book demonstrates that each P5 member has a consistent definition and understanding of what constitutes a threat to the peace.
650 0 $a Human Rights
650 0 $a Human Rights and Humanitarian Law
650 0 $a International Relation
Content Unduh katalog