Cite This        Tampung        Export Record
Judul Conscientious Objection and Human Rights: A Systematic Analysis / Gregor Puppinck
Pengarang Puppinck, Gregor
Penerbitan Leiden : Brill, 2017
Deskripsi Fisik vii, 75 pages ; 24 cm. ;24 cm.
ISBN 9789004341593
Subjek Human Rights
International Law
International Human Rights Law
Abstrak To which extent is it legitimate, in view of freedom of conscience and religion, to sanction individuals for refusing to take part in an activity they claim to be incompatible with their moral or religious convictions? To answer this question, this study first clarifies some of the concepts of conscientious objection. Then it examines the case law of international bodies and draws distinctions in order to differentiate several types of objections, hence identifying the evaluation criteria applicable to the respect that each one deserves. Finally, this study proposes indications as to the rights and obligations of the State in front of those different types of objections.
Bahasa Inggris
Bentuk Karya Tidak ada kode yang sesuai
Target Pembaca Tidak ada kode yang sesuai

 
No Barcode No. Panggil Akses Lokasi Ketersediaan
00000026477 323 PUP c Dapat dipinjam Perpustakaan Lantai 3 - Mahkamah Konstitusi RI Tersedia
pesan
Tag Ind1 Ind2 Isi
001 INLIS000000000009885
005 20221024031346
008 221024################|##########|#eng##
020 # # $a 9789004341593
035 # # $a 0010-0520009885
041 $a eng
082 # # $a 323
084 # # $a 323 PUP c
100 0 # $a Puppinck, Gregor
245 1 # $a Conscientious Objection and Human Rights: A Systematic Analysis /$c Gregor Puppinck
260 # # $a Leiden :$b Brill,$c 2017
300 # # $a vii, 75 pages ; 24 cm. ; $c 24 cm.
520 # # $a To which extent is it legitimate, in view of freedom of conscience and religion, to sanction individuals for refusing to take part in an activity they claim to be incompatible with their moral or religious convictions? To answer this question, this study first clarifies some of the concepts of conscientious objection. Then it examines the case law of international bodies and draws distinctions in order to differentiate several types of objections, hence identifying the evaluation criteria applicable to the respect that each one deserves. Finally, this study proposes indications as to the rights and obligations of the State in front of those different types of objections.
650 4 $a Human Rights
650 4 $a International Human Rights Law
650 4 $a International Law
990 # # $a 26477/MKRI-P/IX-2018
990 # # $a 26477/MKRI-P/IX-2018
Content Unduh katalog