Cite This        Tampung        Export Record
Judul Comparative Constitutional Reasoning / Edited by Andras Jakab
Pengarang Arthur Dyevre
Giulo Itzcovich
Comparative Constitutional Reasoning
Penerbitan New York : Cambridge University Press, 2017
ISBN 9781107085589
Subjek Constitutional law
Constitutional courts
Abstrak To what extent is the language of judicial opinions responsive to the political and social context in which constitutional courts operate? Courts are reason-giving institutions, with argumentation playing a central role in constitutional adjudication. However, a cursory look at just a handful of constitutional systems suggests important differences in the practices of constitutional judges, whether in matters of form, style, or language. Focusing on independently-verified leading cases globally, a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis offers the most comprehensive and systematic account of constitutional reasoning to date. This analysis is supported by the examination of eighteen legal systems around the world including the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice. Universally common aspects of constitutional reasoning are identified in this book, and contributors also examine whether common law countries differ to civil law countries in this respect
Bahasa Inggris
Bentuk Karya Tidak ada kode yang sesuai
Target Pembaca Tidak ada kode yang sesuai

 
No Barcode No. Panggil Akses Lokasi Ketersediaan
00000026524 340.11 COM Dapat dipinjam Perpustakaan Lantai 3 - Mahkamah Konstitusi RI Dipinjam
Tag Ind1 Ind2 Isi
001 INLIS000000000009902
005 20221028031936
008 221028################|##########|#eng##
020 # # $a 9781107085589
035 # # $a 0010-0520009902
041 $a eng
082 # # $a 340.11
084 # # $a 340.11 COM
100 0 # $a Comparative Constitutional Reasoning
245 1 # $a Comparative Constitutional Reasoning /$c Edited by Andras Jakab
260 # # $a New York :$b Cambridge University Press,$c 2017
520 # # $a To what extent is the language of judicial opinions responsive to the political and social context in which constitutional courts operate? Courts are reason-giving institutions, with argumentation playing a central role in constitutional adjudication. However, a cursory look at just a handful of constitutional systems suggests important differences in the practices of constitutional judges, whether in matters of form, style, or language. Focusing on independently-verified leading cases globally, a combination of qualitative and quantitative analysis offers the most comprehensive and systematic account of constitutional reasoning to date. This analysis is supported by the examination of eighteen legal systems around the world including the European Court of Human Rights and the European Court of Justice. Universally common aspects of constitutional reasoning are identified in this book, and contributors also examine whether common law countries differ to civil law countries in this respect
650 4 $a Constitutional courts
650 4 $a Constitutional law
700 0 # $a Arthur Dyevre
700 0 # $a Giulo Itzcovich
990 # # $a 26524/MKRI-P/XII-2018
990 # # $a 26524/MKRI-P/XII-2018
Content Unduh katalog