Detail Katalog

ID: 10158

Judicial dissent in European constitutional courts : a comparative and legal perspective / Katalin Kelemen

Edisi: 1st edition

Pengarang:
Kelemen, Katalin

Penerbit:
Routledge,

Tempat Terbit:
London :

Tahun Terbit:
2016

Subjek

Dissenting opinions--Europe

Deskripsi Fisik:
226 pages

ISBN:
9781315590769

Nomor Panggil:
341.242 KEL j

Control Number:
INLIS000000000010130

BIB ID:
0010-1021000008

Catatan

<a href="https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315590769">e-book</a> ; Dissent in courts has always existed. It is natural and healthy that judges disagree on legal issues of a certain importance and difficulty. The question is if it is reasonable to conceal dissent. Not every legal system allows judges to explain their disagreement to the public in a separate opinion attached to the judgment of the court. Most constitutional courts do. This book presents a comparative analysis of the practice of judicial dissent in constitutional courts from the perspective of the civil law tradition. It discusses the theoretical background, presents the history of the institution and today’s practice, thus laying down the basis for an accurate consideration of the phenomenon from a legal perspective.

Status

Tersedia di OPAC Bibliografi Nasional Indonesia Karya Tulis Ilmiah Nasional

Lihat Cover Original

Informasi Eksemplar & Metadata

Format MARC21 - Total 16 field

Tag	Ind1	Ind2	Nilai	Urutan
001	`_`	`_`	INLIS000000000010130	1
005	`_`	`_`	20211001121356	2
035	`#`	`#`	$a 0010-1021000008	3
007	`_`	`_`	ta	4
008	`_`	`_`	211001################\|##########\|#\|##	5
020	`#`	`#`	$a 9781315590769	6
082	`#`	`#`	$a 341.242	7
084	`#`	`#`	$a 341.242 KEL j	8
100	`_`	`#`	$a Kelemen, Katalin	9
245	`1`	`#`	$a Judicial dissent in European constitutional courts : $b a comparative and legal perspective /$c Katalin Kelemen	10
250	`#`	`#`	$a 1st edition	11
260	`#`	`#`	$a London :$b Routledge,$c 2016	12
300	`#`	`#`	$a 226 pages	13
650	`#`	`4`	$a Dissenting opinions--Europe	14
520	`#`	`#`	$a Dissent in courts has always existed. It is natural and healthy that judges disagree on legal issues of a certain importance and difficulty. The question is if it is reasonable to conceal dissent. Not every legal system allows judges to explain their disagreement to the public in a separate opinion attached to the judgment of the court. Most constitutional courts do. This book presents a comparative analysis of the practice of judicial dissent in constitutional courts from the perspective of the civil law tradition. It discusses the theoretical background, presents the history of the institution and today’s practice, thus laying down the basis for an accurate consideration of the phenomenon from a legal perspective.	15
500	`#`	`#`	$a <a href="https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315590769">e-book</a>	16

Penjelasan Field MARC21:

001: Control Number
005: Date and Time of Latest Transaction
020: ISBN
100: Main Entry - Personal Name
245: Title Statement

250: Edition Statement
260: Publication Information
300: Physical Description
650: Subject
700: Added Entry - Personal Name

Aksi Cepat

Cari Lagi Browse Katalog

Informasi Katalog

Ditambahkan: 01 Oct 2021

Pencarian Terkait

Karya Kelemen Dari Routledge, Subjek: Dissenting opinions-... Tahun 2016