Detail Katalog

ID: 9885
Cover Conscientious Objection and Human Rights: A Systematic Analysis / Gregor Puppinck

Conscientious Objection and Human Rights: A Systematic Analysis / Gregor Puppinck

Pengarang:
Puppinck, Gregor
Penerbit:
Brill,
Tempat Terbit:
Leiden :
Tahun Terbit:
2017
Bahasa:
eng
Subjek
Human Rights -- International Law -- International Human Rights Law
Deskripsi Fisik:
vii, 75 pages ; 24 cm. ; 24 cm.
ISBN:
9789004341593
Nomor Panggil:
323 PUP c
Control Number:
INLIS000000000009885
BIB ID:
0010-0520009885
Catatan
To which extent is it legitimate, in view of freedom of conscience and religion, to sanction individuals for refusing to take part in an activity they claim to be incompatible with their moral or religious convictions? To answer this question, this study first clarifies some of the concepts of conscientious objection. Then it examines the case law of international bodies and draws distinctions in order to differentiate several types of objections, hence identifying the evaluation criteria applicable to the respect that each one deserves. Finally, this study proposes indications as to the rights and obligations of the State in front of those different types of objections.
Status
Tersedia di OPAC Bibliografi Nasional Indonesia Karya Tulis Ilmiah Nasional
Informasi Eksemplar & Metadata
Nomor Barcode Nomor Panggil Akses Lokasi Ketersediaan
00000026477 323 PUP c Dapat dipinjam Mahkamah Konstitusi RI Tersedia
Format MARC21 - Total 18 field
Tag Ind1 Ind2 Nilai Urutan
001 _ _ INLIS000000000009885 1
005 _ _ 20221024031346 2
035 # # $a 0010-0520009885 3
008 _ _ 221024################|##########|#eng## 4
020 # # $a 9789004341593 5
041 _ _ $a eng 6
082 # # $a 323 7
084 # # $a 323 PUP c 8
100 _ # $a Puppinck, Gregor 9
245 1 # $a Conscientious Objection and Human Rights: A Systematic Analysis /$c Gregor Puppinck 10
260 # # $a Leiden :$b Brill,$c 2017 11
300 # # $a vii, 75 pages ; 24 cm. ; $c 24 cm. 12
520 # # $a To which extent is it legitimate, in view of freedom of conscience and religion, to sanction individuals for refusing to take part in an activity they claim to be incompatible with their moral or religious convictions? To answer this question, this study first clarifies some of the concepts of conscientious objection. Then it examines the case law of international bodies and draws distinctions in order to differentiate several types of objections, hence identifying the evaluation criteria applicable to the respect that each one deserves. Finally, this study proposes indications as to the rights and obligations of the State in front of those different types of objections. 13
650 _ 4 $a Human Rights 14
650 _ 4 $a International Law 15
650 _ 4 $a International Human Rights Law 16
990 # # $a 26477/MKRI-P/IX-2018 17
990 # # $a 26477/MKRI-P/IX-2018 18
Penjelasan Field MARC21:
  • 001: Control Number
  • 005: Date and Time of Latest Transaction
  • 020: ISBN
  • 100: Main Entry - Personal Name
  • 245: Title Statement
  • 250: Edition Statement
  • 260: Publication Information
  • 300: Physical Description
  • 650: Subject
  • 700: Added Entry - Personal Name
Informasi Katalog

Ditambahkan: 29 Jan 2020
Disetujui OPAC: 08 May 2020
Export