=LDR  00000nam  2200000   4500
=001  INLIS000000000002740
=005  20221027080654
=035  ##$$a 0010-0520002740
=008  221027################|##########|#eng##
=020  ##$$a 9781402052002
=041    $$a eng
=082  ##$$a 331.120218
=084  ##$$a 331.120218 QUA
=100   #$$a Qualitative Indicators of Labour Standards : Comparative Methods and Applications
=245  1#$$a Qualitative Indicators of Labour Standards : $b Comparative Methods and Applications /$c Edited by David Kucera
=260  ##$$a Dordrecht,$c 2007
=300  ##$$a v, 296 p. : $b : illus. ; $c 25 cm
=500  ##$$a Indeks : p. 285 - 296
=520  ##$$a Recent years have witnessed a rapidly growing interest in the use and construction of "qualitative" indicators of labour standards. This is likely attributable to several factors: the rise of "socially responsible" investment, ongoing debates on the effects of labour standards on international competitiveness, and the sense that traditional quantitative indicators of labour standards are too narrow in scope to adequately capture the wide-ranging and inherently qualitative nature of many aspects of labour standards. Qualitative indicators, while generally having numerical values, are based on such methods as grading by experts, the coding of legislation, and the coding of other textual sources addressing violations of a more de facto nature. Measuring compliance with labour standards is an undertaking intrinsically fraught with difficulty.
=650   4$$a Labor Policy -- Congresses
=650   4$$a Labor -- Standards -- Congresses
=990  ##$$a 10156/MKRI-P/XI-2008
=990  ##$$a 10157/MKRI-P/XI-2008
=990  ##$$a 10157/MKRI-P/XI-2008
=990  ##$$a 10156/MKRI-P/XI-2008
=990  ##$$a 10156/MKRI-P/XI-2008
=990  ##$$a 10157/MKRI-P/XI-2008