=LDR  00000nam  2200000   4500
=001  INLIS000000000009397
=005  20221108094941
=035  ##$$a 0010-0520009397
=008  221108################|##########|#eng##
=020  ##$$a 0674022106
=041    $$a eng
=082  ##$$a 347.73
=084  ##$$a 347.73 VER j
=100   #$$a Vermeule, Andrian
=245  1#$$a Judging Under Uncertainty : $b An Institutional Theory of Legal Interpretation /$c Andrian Vermeule
=260  ##$$a London :$b Cambridge University Press,$c 2006
=300  ##$$a viii ; 333 hlm ;22 cm ; $c 22 cm
=500  ##$$a Indeks : hlm. 323-333
=520  ##$$a How should judges, in America and elsewhere, interpret statutes and the Constitution? Previous work on these fundamental questions has typically started from abstract views about the nature of democracy or constitutionalism, or the nature of legal language, or the essence of the rule of law. From these conceptual premises, theorists typically deduce an ambitious role for judges, particularly in striking down statutes on constitutional grounds. In this book, Adrian Vermeule breaks new ground by rejecting both the conceptual approach and the judge-centered conclusions of older theorists. Vermeule shows that any
=650   4$$a 1.Judicial Review
=650   4$$a 2.Law-United States-Interpretation & Construction
=650   4$$a 3.Judicial Proses
=990  ##$$a 05796/MKRI-P/IX-2008
=990  ##$$a 07724/MKRI-P/XII-2007
=990  ##$$a 22474/MKRI-P/XI-2011
=990  ##$$a 22473/MKRI-P/XI-2011
=990  ##$$a 05796/MKRI-P/IX-2008
=990  ##$$a 07724/MKRI-P/XII-2007
=990  ##$$a 22474/MKRI-P/XI-2011
=990  ##$$a 22473/MKRI-P/XI-2011
=990  ##$$a 22473/MKRI-P/XI-2011
=990  ##$$a 05796/MKRI-P/IX-2008
=990  ##$$a 07724/MKRI-P/XII-2007
=990  ##$$a 22474/MKRI-P/XI-2011
=990  ##$$a 22474/MKRI-P/XI-2011
=990  ##$$a 05796/MKRI-P/IX-2008
=990  ##$$a 07724/MKRI-P/XII-2007
=990  ##$$a 22473/MKRI-P/XI-2011
=990  ##$$a 07724/MKRI-P/XII-2007
=990  ##$$a 05796/MKRI-P/IX-2008
=990  ##$$a 22474/MKRI-P/XI-2011
=990  ##$$a 22473/MKRI-P/XI-2011