<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nam  2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">INLIS000000000010534</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20221027024540</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">0010-0622000005</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">221027################g##########0#eng##</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="020" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">978-94-007-5347-1</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="082" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">340.2</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">340.2 EXC</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Exclusionary Rules in Comparative Law</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Exclusionary Rules in Comparative Law /</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Edited by Stephen C.Thaman</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="250" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">vol.20</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="260" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Dordrecht :</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">Springer,</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">2013</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="300" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">xv, 454 pages ;</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">24 cm</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="#" ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">Exclusionary rule (Evidence)--Congresses</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">This book is a comparative study of the exclusion of illegally gathered evidence inthe criminal trial, which include 15 country studies, a chapter on the European Court of Human Right, and a comparative synthetic conclusion. No other book has undertaken such a broad comparative study of exclusionary rules, which have now become a worldwide phenomenom. The topic is one of the most controversial in criminal procedure law, because it reveals a constant tension between the criminal court's duty to ascertain the truth, on the one hand, and its duty to upload important constitutional rights on the other, most importantly, the previlege against self-incrimination and the right to privacy in one's home and one's private communications.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">25203/MKRI-P/VII-2016</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">25203/MKRI-P/VII-2016</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>
