<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nam  2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">INLIS000000000010728</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20221125014551</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">0010-1122000070</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">221125################g##########0#eng##</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="020" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">978-0-521-89590-3</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="082" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">347.01</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">347.01 RUL r</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Rule by Law :</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes /</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Tom Ginsburg, Tamir Moustafa [editor]</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="260" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">New York :</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press,</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">2008</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="300" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">387 hlm ;</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">25 cm</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="#" ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">Law</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1="#" ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">Politics</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Scholars have generally assumed that courts in authoritarian states are pawns of their regimes, upholding the interests of governing elites and frustrating the efforts of their opponents. As a result, nearly all studies in comparative judicial politics have focused on democratic and democratizing countries. This volume brings together leading scholars in comparative judicial politics to consider the causes and consequences of judicial empowerment in authoritarian states. It demonstrates the wide range of governance tasks that courts perform, as well as the way in which courts can serve as critical sites of contention both among the ruling elite and between regimes and their citizens. Drawing on empirical and theoretical insights from every major region of the world, this volume advances our understanding of judicial politics in authoritarian regimes.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">22167/MKRI-P/XI-2011</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">22168/MKRI-P/XI-2011</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>
