<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nam  2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">INLIS000000000011066</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20241220052225</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">0010-1224000001</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <controlfield tag="007">ta</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">241220################|##########|#|##</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="020" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">9781139035293</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="082" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">342</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">342 BAR p</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Barak, Aharon</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Proportionality :</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">constitutional rights and their limitations /</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Aharon Barak</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="260" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Cambridge, U.K :</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press,</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">2012</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="300" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">xxvi, 611 p ;</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">24 cm</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="500" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">&lt;a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/proportionality/6E9C523D5653FEE453068DEFECF4C4F5"&gt;e-book&lt;/a&gt;</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Having identified proportionality as the main tool for limiting constitutional rights, Aharon Barak explores its four components (proper purpose, rational connection, necessity and proportionality stricto sensu) and discusses the relationships between proportionality and reasonableness and between courts and legislation. He goes on to analyse the concept of deference and to consider the main arguments against the use of proportionality (incommensurability and irrationality). Alternatives to proportionality are compared and future developments of proportionality are suggested.</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>
