<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nam  2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">INLIS000000000001426</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20221107082941</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">0010-0520001426</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <controlfield tag="008">221107################|##########|#eng##</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="020" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">987-0836-613100</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="082" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">346.73</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">346.73 BLO e</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Bloomenthal, Harold S.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Emerging Trends in Securities Law /</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Harold S.Bloomenthal and Samuel Wolff</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="250" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Cet.1</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="260" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Minneapolist :</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">West Group,</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">1998</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="300" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">cxi,1309 hlm</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="500" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Indeks : 1-32</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Emerging trends in securities law for the tenth year chonicles securities developments for the year measured between July 1 of the preceding year through June 30 of the current year, the end of the Supreme Court's most recent term. In some instances developments post-June 30 and prior to publications have been taken into account There was no decision of the Supreme Court during its last term directly relating to securities regulation. A decisions of the Court that suggest civil penalties are unlikely to constitute jeopardy under the double jeopardy claus lessens concerns when the Comissions seeks civil penalties before determining whether to refer a matter for criminal prosecution that such penalties may preclude a criminal prosecution.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">1.Securities-United States-cases</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">2.Securities Fraud-United States-Cases</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Samuel Wolff</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">07686/MKRI-P/XII-2007</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">07686/MKRI-P/XII-2007</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>
