<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nam  2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">INLIS000000000001469</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20221109112459</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">0010-0520001469</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <controlfield tag="008">221109################|##########|#eng##</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="020" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">0-521-77428-4</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="082" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">347.94035</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">347.94035 PAT j</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Patapan,Haig</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Judging Democracy :</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">The New Politics of The High Court of Australia /</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Haig Patapan</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="250" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">1</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="260" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">UK :</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press,</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">2000</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="300" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">XI, 206 p. ; 22,9cm ;</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">22,9cm</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="500" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Indeks : Index</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="504" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Bibliography</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">This book is in part a response to the Australian High Court?s Invitation for what it has called ?informed criticism? of its decisions. Informed criticism in this case required more than the usual categories or dichotomies-of activist/deferential, progressive/conservative- that tend to dominate commentary, not because they tend to partisanship and there-fore inaccuracy, but because they are often inadequate intellectual tools that do not do justice to the fundamental legal and political changes we need to consider in evaluating wthe new politics of the High Court.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">1. Australia High Court-Political Activity</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">2. Democracy Australia</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">05800/MKRI-P/IX-2008</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">06642/MKRI-P/XII-2007</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">05800/MKRI-P/IX-2008</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">06642/MKRI-P/XII-2007</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>
