<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nam  2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">INLIS000000000002072</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20200508201724</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">200508|||||||||   |   |||   |||| ||eng||</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">0521463505</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">010-0520002072</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">341.1</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">341.1/H.L/A</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">H.Lauterpacht</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Annual Digest of Public International Law Years 1929-1930. 06950</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Cambridge</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">Grotius publications LTD.</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">1981</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">xxxvi,534 hal ;24cm</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">24cm</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">This volume of the Digest-the fifth in succession-covers the years 1929 and 1930. It has been edited on the same lines as its predecessor. The principal changes are of a typographical nature, and they ought perhaps to be mentioned here for the convenience of the reader. The "facts" are printed in the same way as the rest of the decision; the perpendicular lines distinguishing the international cases have disappeared; the cases decided by the Pennanent Court of International Justice are printed in the same type as other cases. In general, both for the sake of economy and in deference to suggestions made by critics, an effort has been made to reduce the variety of the type used in previous editions. But otherwise there has been no substantial change in the method adopted in previous years, except that the dissecting of decisions has been aban­doned in a number of cases in order to give a trial to the policy, recommended by some well-wishers of the Digest, of reporting the case as a whole and inserting cross-references indicating the various points of law covered by the decision.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">1. International Law-Cases</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>
