<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nam  2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">INLIS000000000002266</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20241022120135</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">0010-0520002266</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <controlfield tag="008">241022################|##########|#eng##</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="020" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">1-904385-07-9x</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="082" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">340.11</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">340.11 RAB m</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Raban, Ofer</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Modern Legal Theory and Judicial Impartiality /</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Raban Ofer</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="260" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">London :</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">GlassHouse Pess,</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">2003</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="300" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">vii, 124p.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="500" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Indeks : Indeks</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">this book looks at various legal theories with the following perspective in mind : it examines their view on the impartility of legal interpretation. the book, which deals with a number of school of thoght, is structured around two principal (and rival) theorist - HLA hart and Ronald Dworkin. Moreover, both Hart and Dworkin defend positions that are contructive rather than critical : their theories are paradigms of the search for an impartial legal interpretation. As such, they often constitue a necessary background to many critical theories - some equally extreme and insightfull - whose most basic project, as we shall see, is to deny such impartiality.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">1. Law - philosophy</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">2. Jurisprudence</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">3. Judicial ethics 4. Justice</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">05128/MKRI-P/I-2008</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">05370/MKRI-P/IV-2008</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">05130/MKRI-P/2008</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">05131/MKRI-P/I-2008</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">05129/MKRI-P/I-2008</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>
