<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nam  2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">INLIS000000000002299</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20221101014802</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">0010-0520002299</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <controlfield tag="008">221101################|##########|#eng##</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="020" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">978-658-767-857</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="082" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">342</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">342 IYE j</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Iyer, T.K.K</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Judicial Review of Reasonableness in Constitutional Law /</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">T.K.K. Iyer</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="260" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">London :</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">The Madras Law Journal Office,</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">1979</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="300" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">lx, 239 p. ;</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">24 cm</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="500" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Indeks : indeks</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="504" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Binliography</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Judicial review under a constitutional frame work, is, in one view, as Iyer brings out "a value ridden policy making exercuse". It is only natural that such studies should highlight judicial activism or restraint. Restraint may be called for when there is reasonable hope that political forces may themselves find the need solution in the near future, but pursuit of this dichotomy seems fruitless beyond a point, because in spesific cases at least self-restraint could reflect political attitudes.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">Judicial review - India</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">Constitutional Law - India</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">Judicial review</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">00841/MKRI-P/I-2005</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">00842/MKRI-P/I-2005</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">00842/MKRI-P/I-2005</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">00841/MKRI-P/I-2005</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">00841/MKRI-P/I-2005</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">00842/MKRI-P/I-2005</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>
