<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nam  2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">INLIS000000000006602</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20221026024244</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">0010-0520006602</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <controlfield tag="008">221026################|##########|#eng##</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="020" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">978-019-5671341</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="082" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">336.354</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">336.354 FIS</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Fiscal Decentralization to Rural Governments in India</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Fiscal Decentralization to Rural Governments in India /</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Edited by Geeta Sethi</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="260" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">New York :</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">Oxford University Press,</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">2004</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="300" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">251 p. ;</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">26 cm.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="504" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">210- 215</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">this volume presents a case for fiscal decentralizion to panchayats.the internt is to its costs and benefits.while are some perceived costs in terms of reducced central ability to implement macroeconomic stabilization programes and possible efficienty losses due to poor local capitaly,ithas been strongly argued in its favour that decentralization reluts in better service delivery,popular involvement in govermance ,and revenue mobilization.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">kebijakan fikal india</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">01713/MKRI-P/II-2005</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">01713/MKRI-P/II-2005</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>
