<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nam  2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">INLIS000000000007487</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20221104045829</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">0010-0520007487</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <controlfield tag="008">221104################|##########|#eng##</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="020" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">1-84113-180-6</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="082" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">347.012</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">347.012 ELL c</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Elliot, Mark</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Review /</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Mark Elliot</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="250" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Cet. 2.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="260" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Oregon :</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">Hart Publishing,</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">2001</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="300" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">xxxii, 260 p. ;</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">24,5 cm</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="500" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Indeks : Index</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">The book seeks to develop a constitutional rationale for judical review which founds its legitimacy in core principles such as the rule of law, the separation of powers and the sovereignty of Parliament. It presents a detailed analysis of the interface between constitutional and administrative law, and will be of interest to all public lawyers.Resent years havewitnessed a vibbrant debate cencerning the Constitutional basis of judicial review.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">Judicial Review of Administrative Acts-Great Britain</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">01573/MKRI-P/II-2005</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">05618/MKRI-P/VI-2008</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">05618/MKRI-P/VI-2008</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">01573/MKRI-P/II-2005</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">01573/MKRI-P/II-2005</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">05618/MKRI-P/VI-2008</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>
