<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nam  2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">INLIS000000000009243</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20221018090035</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">0010-0520009243</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <controlfield tag="008">221018################|##########|#ind##</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="020" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">9786028342016</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">ind</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="082" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">303.64</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">303.64 LYO d</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Lyons, Terrence</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Demilitarizing politics: elections on the uncertain road to peace /</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Terrence Lyons</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="260" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Colorado :</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">pustaka yassir,</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">2005</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="300" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">vii, 232 hlm.; 23,5 cm ;</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">23,5 cm</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">With the increasing use of elections as a tool for peacebuilding after civil war, the question of why some postconflict elections succeed and others fail is a crucial one. Tackling this question, Terrence Lyons finds the answer in the internal political dynamics that occur between the cease-fire and the voting. Lyons shows that the promise of elections can provide the incentive for the demilitarization of politics—-he transformation of institutions made powerful by war into those capable of sustaining peace—so that warring parties will in fact choose to change their strategies and adapt to peaceful electoral competition. It is this process of demilitarization that is in turn key to meaningful elections; elections alone, as has been seen repeatedly, are not enough to advance the dual goals of peace and democracy. Incorporating evidence from a range of recent cases, Demilitarizing Politics offers a concrete strategy for peaceful change that can be implemented, and that can make a difference.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">Elections-case studies; Conflict management-case studies</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">Peacebuilding-case studies</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">Democrarcy-case studies</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">22943/MKRI-P/X-2014</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">22942/MKRI-P/X-2014</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>
