<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nam  2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">INLIS000000000009404</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20221108052149</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">0010-0520009404</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <controlfield tag="008">221108################|##########|#eng##</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="020" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">978-0521140195</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="082" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">342.410 52</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">342.410 52 GOL p</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Goldsworthy, Jeffrey Denys</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Parliamentary Sovereignty :</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">Contemporary Debates /</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">Jeffrey Denys Goldsworthy</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="260" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Cambridge ; New York :</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">Cambridge University Press,</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">2010</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="300" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">xii, 326 p. ; 24 cm. ;</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">24 cm.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">"This book has four main themes: (1) a criticism of ’common law constitutionalism’, the theory that Parliament’s authority is conferred by, and therefore is or can be made subordinate to judge-made common law; (2) an analysis of Parliament’s ability to abdicate, limit or regulate the exercise of its own authority, including a revision of Dicey’s conception of sovereignty, a repudiation of the doctrine of implied repeal and the proposal of a novel theory of ’manner and form’ requirements for law-making; (3) an examination of the relationship between parliamentary sovereignty and statutory interpretation, defending the reality of legislative intentions, and their indispensability to sensible interpretation and respect for parliamentary sovereignty; and (4) an assessment of the compatibility of parliamentary sovereignty with recent constitutional developments, including the expansion of judicial review of administrative action, the Human Rights and European Communities Acts and the growing recognition of ’constitutional principles’ and ’constitutional statutes’".</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">Great Britain; Parliament;  Legislative power --Great Britain; Legislation --Great Britain</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">Legislation --Great Britain; Law --Great Britain --Interpretation and construction</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">Law --Great Britain --Interpretation and construction.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">22281/MKRI-P/XI-2011</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">22282/MKRI-P/XI-2011</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">22282/MKRI-P/XI-2011</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">22281/MKRI-P/XI-2011</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>
