<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nam  2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">INLIS000000000009628</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20221103103215</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">0010-0520009628</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <controlfield tag="008">221103################|##########|#eng##</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="020" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">978-0-314-26609-5</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="082" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">342.73</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">342.73 NOW p</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Nowak, John E</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Ronald D. Rotunda</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">Principles of Constitutional Law /</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">John E. Nowak and Ronald D. Rotunda</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="260" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">St. Paul, MN :</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">West,</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">2010</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="300" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">xxvi, 875 p. ;</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">24 cm.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">The Court might have held that the right did not vest until delivery of the commission, thus avoiding the constitutional issues, but the Court instead stated that an irrevocable right accrued to individual after the execution of the commission. The Court thus critized the new administration and President Jefferson, who was Marshall’ political adversary. On the second issue, the opinion found that the “essence of civil liberty” required a legal remedy for a legal wrong. Because the government of the United States is one “of laws and not of men” it must grant a remedy for violation of vested legal rights. Marshall did note that there would not be a judicial remedy for a wrong if the subject matter was political in nature of otherwise committed to the discretion of the executive.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
      <subfield code="a">Constitutional law --United States.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">22149/MKRI-P/XI-2011</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">22148/MKRI-P/XI-2011</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">22149/MKRI-P/XI-2011</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">22148/MKRI-P/XI-2011</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">22148/MKRI-P/XI-2011</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="990" ind1="#" ind2="#">
      <subfield code="a">22149/MKRI-P/XI-2011</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>
