<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nam  2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">INLIS000000000009727</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20200508204929</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">200508|||||||||   |   |||   |||| ||eng||</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">978-90-04-35601-6</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">010-0520009727</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">344.01</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">344.01/ORM/T</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Maria Victoria Cabrera Ormaza</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The Requirement of Consultation with Indigenous Peoples in the ILO : Between Normative Flexibility and Institutional Rigidity</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Leiden</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">Brill</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">2017</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">&lt;a href="https://brill.com/view/title/35882"&gt;e-book&lt;/a&gt;</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">In The Requirement of Consultation with Indigenous Peoples in the ILO, María Victoria Cabrera Ormaza examines the law-making and interpretive practice of the International Labour Organization (ILO) relating to indigenous peoples with a particular focus on the consultation requirement established by Article 6 of ILO Convention No. 169. Taking into account both the mandate and institutional characteristics of the ILO, the author explains how the ILO understands the notion of consultation with indigenous peoples and outlines the flaws in its approach. Through a comprehensive analysis of state practice and human rights jurisprudence concerning indigenous peoples, the author explores the normative impact of ILO Convention No. 169, while revisiting the ILO’s potential to help harmonize different interpretations of the consultation requirement.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">International Labour Organization</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Labor laws and legislation, International</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Indigenous peoples--Legal status, laws, etc.</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>
