<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nam  2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">INLIS000000000009754</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20200508204936</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">200508|||||||||   |   |||   |||| ||eng||</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">978-90-04-36196-6</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">010-0520009754</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">342.08</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">342.08/SCH/T</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Jessica Schultz</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The Internal Protection Alternative in Refugee Law</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Leiden</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">Brill</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">2019</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">xii, 432 pp</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">&lt;a href= "https://brill.com/abstract/title/36269"&gt;e-book&lt;/a&gt;</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Under what circumstances can a state refuse refugee status to a person whose risk of persecution exists in only part of her country of origin? This book is the first monograph to examine the treaty basis and criteria for the internal protection alternative (IPA), an exception to refugee status increasingly invoked by state parties to the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol. Through a critical analysis of the relationship between refugee law and related fields, Schultz finds that the legal scope for IPA practice is narrower than is commonly claimed. Since persons subject to an IPA analysis have a well-founded fear of persecution within their countries of origin, any limit on their right to refugee status must involve a careful balancing of the impact of continued displacement against the states interest in preserving its restricted protection resources. She argues that the doctrine of implied limits in human rights law can provide analytic structure to the IPA concept and reduce the risk of overly broad application</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Human Rights</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Human Rights and Humanitarian Law</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Humanitarian Law</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>
