<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">
  <record>
    <leader>00000nam  2200000   4500</leader>
    <controlfield tag="001">INLIS000000000009781</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="005">20200508204943</controlfield>
    <controlfield tag="008">200508|||||||||   |   |||   |||| ||eng||</controlfield>
    <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">978-90-04-36612-1</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="035" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="0">010-0520009781</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="041" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">eng</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">343</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">343/DUM/F</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Patrick Dumberry</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Fair and Equitable Treatment</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">Leiden</subfield>
      <subfield code="b">Brill</subfield>
      <subfield code="c">2018</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">vi, 82 pp.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="500" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">&lt;a href="https://brill.com/abstract/title/37944"&gt;e-book&lt;/a&gt;</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">The fair and equitable treatment (FET) standard is a type of protection found in BITs which has become in the last decades one of the most controversial provisions examined by arbitral tribunals. This book first examines the interaction between the minimum standard of treatment (MST) and the FET standard and the question why States started referring to the former in their BITs. It also addresses the question whether the FET should be considered as an autonomous standard of protection under BITs. This book also examines the controversial proposition that the FET standard should now be considered as a rule of customary international law. I will show that while the practice of States to include FET clauses in their BITs can be considered as general, widespread and representative, it remains that it is not uniform and consistent enough for the standard to have crystallised into a customary rule. States also lack the necessary opinio juris when including the clause in their BITs.</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">International Dispute Resolution &amp; Arbitration</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">International Law</subfield>
    </datafield>
    <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
      <subfield code="a">International Law: General Interest</subfield>
    </datafield>
  </record>
</collection>
