.jpg)
| Judul | Fact Investigation From Hypothesis to Proof 07600 |
| Pengarang | David A Binder |
| EDISI | Cet.1 |
| Penerbitan | Minneapolist Sage Publications 1984 |
| Deskripsi Fisik | xxi,354 hlm |
| ISBN | 0-314-81258-x |
| Subjek | Evidance(Law)-US Investigation |
| Abstrak | Describes how facts are proved at trial, examining the principal categories of rational and psychological evidence, which is the basis of trial "stories." How, at trial, does each party tell a story bolstering its own legal position and detracting from that of its adversary? What attributes of stories tend to make them persuasive? From these attributes, the authors derive a set of investigatory objectives that generally apply, regardless of the nature of the case. With objectives in place, turns to the thought processes that lawyers employ to analyze and develop evidence. |
| Catatan | Indeks : 347-354 |
| Bahasa | Inggris |
| Bentuk Karya | Tidak ada kode yang sesuai |
| Target Pembaca | Tidak ada kode yang sesuai |
| No Barcode | No. Panggil | Akses | Lokasi | Ketersediaan |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 00000007600 | 347.307/BIN/F | Dapat dipinjam | Perpustakaan Lantai 3 - Mahkamah Konstitusi RI | Tersedia
pesan |
| Tag | Ind1 | Ind2 | Isi |
| 001 | INLIS000000000001364 | ||
| 005 | 20200508201434 | ||
| 008 | 200508||||||||| | ||| |||| ||eng|| | ||
| 020 | $a 0-314-81258-x | ||
| 035 | 0010-0520001364 | ||
| 041 | $a eng | ||
| 082 | 0 | $a 347.307 | |
| 084 | $a 347.307/BIN/F | ||
| 100 | 0 | $a David A Binder | |
| 245 | 0 | 0 | $a Fact Investigation From Hypothesis to Proof 07600 |
| 250 | $a Cet.1 | ||
| 260 | $a Minneapolist $b Sage Publications $c 1984 | ||
| 300 | $a xxi,354 hlm | ||
| 500 | $a Indeks : 347-354 | ||
| 520 | $a Describes how facts are proved at trial, examining the principal categories of rational and psychological evidence, which is the basis of trial "stories." How, at trial, does each party tell a story bolstering its own legal position and detracting from that of its adversary? What attributes of stories tend to make them persuasive? From these attributes, the authors derive a set of investigatory objectives that generally apply, regardless of the nature of the case. With objectives in place, turns to the thought processes that lawyers employ to analyze and develop evidence. | ||
| 650 | 0 | $a Evidance(Law)-US | |
| 650 | 0 | $a Investigation |
Content Unduh katalog
Karya Terkait :