Detail Katalog

ID: 2299

Judicial Review of Reasonableness in Constitutional Law / T.K.K. Iyer

Pengarang:
Iyer, T.K.K

Penerbit:
The Madras Law Journal Office,

Tempat Terbit:
London :

Tahun Terbit:
1979

Bahasa:
eng

Subjek

Judicial review - India -- Constitutional Law - India -- Judicial review

Deskripsi Fisik:
lx, 239 p. ; 24 cm

ISBN:
978-658-767-857

Nomor Panggil:
342 IYE j

Control Number:
INLIS000000000002299

BIB ID:
0010-0520002299

Catatan

Indeks : indeks ; Binliography ; Judicial review under a constitutional frame work, is, in one view, as Iyer brings out "a value ridden policy making exercuse". It is only natural that such studies should highlight judicial activism or restraint. Restraint may be called for when there is reasonable hope that political forces may themselves find the need solution in the near future, but pursuit of this dichotomy seems fruitless beyond a point, because in spesific cases at least self-restraint could reflect political attitudes.

Status

Tersedia di OPAC Bibliografi Nasional Indonesia Karya Tulis Ilmiah Nasional

Lihat Cover Original

Informasi Eksemplar & Metadata

Nomor Barcode	Nomor Panggil	Akses	Lokasi	Ketersediaan
`00000000841`	`342 IYE j`	Dapat dipinjam	Mahkamah Konstitusi RI	Tersedia
`00000000842`	`342 IYE j`	Dapat dipinjam	Mahkamah Konstitusi RI	Tersedia

Format MARC21 - Total 24 field

Tag	Ind1	Ind2	Nilai	Urutan
001	`_`	`_`	INLIS000000000002299	1
005	`_`	`_`	20221101014802	2
035	`#`	`#`	$a 0010-0520002299	3
008	`_`	`_`	221101################\|##########\|#eng##	4
020	`#`	`#`	$a 978-658-767-857	5
041	`_`	`_`	$a eng	6
082	`#`	`#`	$a 342	7
084	`#`	`#`	$a 342 IYE j	8
100	`_`	`#`	$a Iyer, T.K.K	9
245	`1`	`#`	$a Judicial Review of Reasonableness in Constitutional Law /$c T.K.K. Iyer	10
260	`#`	`#`	$a London :$b The Madras Law Journal Office,$c 1979	11
300	`#`	`#`	$a lx, 239 p. ; $c 24 cm	12
500	`#`	`#`	$a Indeks : indeks	13
504	`#`	`#`	$a Binliography	14
520	`#`	`#`	$a Judicial review under a constitutional frame work, is, in one view, as Iyer brings out "a value ridden policy making exercuse". It is only natural that such studies should highlight judicial activism or restraint. Restraint may be called for when there is reasonable hope that political forces may themselves find the need solution in the near future, but pursuit of this dichotomy seems fruitless beyond a point, because in spesific cases at least self-restraint could reflect political attitudes.	15
650	`_`	`4`	$a Judicial review - India	16
650	`_`	`4`	$a Constitutional Law - India	17
650	`_`	`4`	$a Judicial review	18
990	`#`	`#`	$a 00841/MKRI-P/I-2005	19
990	`#`	`#`	$a 00842/MKRI-P/I-2005	20
990	`#`	`#`	$a 00842/MKRI-P/I-2005	21
990	`#`	`#`	$a 00841/MKRI-P/I-2005	22
990	`#`	`#`	$a 00841/MKRI-P/I-2005	23
990	`#`	`#`	$a 00842/MKRI-P/I-2005	24

Penjelasan Field MARC21:

001: Control Number
005: Date and Time of Latest Transaction
020: ISBN
100: Main Entry - Personal Name
245: Title Statement

250: Edition Statement
260: Publication Information
300: Physical Description
650: Subject
700: Added Entry - Personal Name

Aksi Cepat

Cari Lagi Browse Katalog

Informasi Katalog

Ditambahkan: 21 Jan 2008
Disetujui OPAC: 08 May 2020

Pencarian Terkait

Karya Iyer Dari The Madras Law Journal Office, Subjek: Judicial review - In... Tahun 1979